IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jrinsu/v93y2026i2p349-387.html

From gateway to value ladder—The curious case of online mutual aid in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ze Chen
  • Runhuan Feng
  • Miao Guo
  • Tianyang Wang

Abstract

This study examines how InsurTech‐enabled information provision, specifically the disclosure of claimant information previously unavailable in conventional insurance, influences individuals' insurance uptake. We leverage Mutual Aid (MA) platforms as a natural context to examine how socially framed loss information, peer influence, and salience shape insurance decisions, offering broader insights into the role of InsurTech within traditional insurance markets. Using unique user‐level data from a leading MA platform in China and a dynamic discrete choice framework, we show that engagement with MA activities significantly increases the likelihood of subsequent private insurance uptake. Our counterfactual simulations highlight the critical role of strategically structured information in promoting insurance adoption. Overall, the study demonstrates how a digitally mediated and publicly observable risk‐sharing environment can shape consumer behavior and provides new perspectives on the evolving intersection between InsurTech and traditional insurance markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Ze Chen & Runhuan Feng & Miao Guo & Tianyang Wang, 2026. "From gateway to value ladder—The curious case of online mutual aid in China," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 93(2), pages 349-387, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:93:y:2026:i:2:p:349-387
    DOI: 10.1111/jori.70038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.70038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jori.70038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:93:y:2026:i:2:p:349-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ariaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.