IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jregsc/v66y2026i3p746-765.html

Delinking Social Identity From Rural‐Urban Stereotypes: The Labor Market Effects of Abolishing Agricultural Hukou in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Jiang
  • Yue Yin

Abstract

Delinking social identity from entrenched stereotypes can reshape economic behavior. This study exploits China's hukou reform, which abolished the agricultural‐nonagricultural distinction and weakened the institutional foundation of rural‐urban identity, to assess its labor market impacts. Using nationally representative survey data and a difference‐in‐differences design across 89 cities, we find that rural stayers benefited most, with annual earnings increasing by about 17 percent and greater access to nonagricultural jobs. In contrast, rural‐urban migrants experienced no income gains and declining nonagricultural employment, while urban incumbents faced higher risks of nonemployment. The mechanisms include lower educational barriers, employment shifts that increased instability, and expanded rural opportunities. Heterogeneity analysis shows that rural stayers benefited disproportionately, especially the highly educated and those in moderately developed regions, whereas low‐educated migrants and incumbents were most adversely affected. Overall, the findings provide causal evidence on the distributional consequences of hukou reform and the uneven effects of delinking social identity from rural‐urban stereotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Jiang & Yue Yin, 2026. "Delinking Social Identity From Rural‐Urban Stereotypes: The Labor Market Effects of Abolishing Agricultural Hukou in China," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 746-765, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:66:y:2026:i:3:p:746-765
    DOI: 10.1111/jors.70032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.70032
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jors.70032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:66:y:2026:i:3:p:746-765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-4146 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.