IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jregsc/v66y2026i2p685-702.html

The Causal Relationship Between Jurisdiction Size and Institutional Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Augusto Cerqua
  • Costanza Giannantoni
  • Federico Zampollo

Abstract

While the relationship between jurisdiction size and economic and electoral outcomes has been extensively studied, its causal impact on institutional capacity and quality remains unexplored. Leveraging the mergers of 197 Italian municipalities, we investigate changes in administrative quality using the Municipal Administration Quality Index (MAQI), a novel composite measure of local administrative capacity and quality based on three pillars: bureaucratic, political, and economic. Using a non‐parametric difference‐in‐differences approach, we find that mergers substantially improve administrative performance. This improvement is driven primarily by the enhanced quality of local politicians and strengthened economic‐fiscal performance, whereas bureaucratic efficiency improves only marginally. We demonstrate that these positive outcomes are attributable to economies of scale and the self‐selection of higher‐quality local politicians, who are drawn by the opportunity to earn higher wages. Our findings contribute to the broader debate on the optimal municipal size and demonstrate that municipal mergers among small municipalities can enhance the quality of local government.

Suggested Citation

  • Augusto Cerqua & Costanza Giannantoni & Federico Zampollo, 2026. "The Causal Relationship Between Jurisdiction Size and Institutional Quality," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(2), pages 685-702, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:685-702
    DOI: 10.1111/jors.70057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.70057
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jors.70057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:685-702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-4146 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.