Author
Listed:
- Francesco Rania
- Emanuela Macrì
- Valeria Morea
Abstract
Technical efficiency analysis is widely applied in the cultural and creative sectors. However, little research uses this notion to understand how these economic activities perform at the urban level. In this paper, conceptually, we operationalize urban creativity (UC) as the joint realm of cultural heritage and creative economy; empirically, we measure UC by combining their respective technical‐efficiency scores via entropy‐weighted aggregation. Our research focuses on 107 Italian cities at NUTS‐3 levels and tests the diverse contributions made by the activities mentioned above in the period from 2014 to 2019. Data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis, both considered in two‐stages approach and output‐oriented, were combined through weighted entropy. The first results show that cultural heritage is the most efficient and decisive contributor to the UC index. In the entropy‑weighted composite, a high CH efficiency score carries greater weight and thus contributes more strongly to overall UC. Conversely, where CH efficiency is weaker, a high CE score can partially compensate, reflecting a synergy mechanism in the composite index. Moreover, we found that small cities tend to make careful and efficient use of resources, while most of the large cities, even when well‐endowed, struggle to govern their CCIs efficiently. This work also examines the contribution of external factors to UC, finding that the influence of GDP, crime, unemployment, educational level, and geographical location (South‐North or West‐East) on UC is limited to specific clusters or peripheral cities. Political faith, understood as local political action, has a generally positive effect and can result in up to +14% improvement, with less equipped cities more likely to benefit from it.
Suggested Citation
Francesco Rania & Emanuela Macrì & Valeria Morea, 2026.
"Urban Creativity: An Efficiency Evaluation Combining DEA With SFA Models,"
Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(2), pages 574-601, March.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:574-601
DOI: 10.1111/jors.70052
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:574-601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-4146 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.