IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jregsc/v65y2025i5p1468-1487.html

The Impact of Relaxing Internal Migration Restrictions on Urban Natives' Subjective Well‐Being: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence From China's Hukou Reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Weiliang Hu
  • Haiyang Lu
  • Keya Zeng

Abstract

This study examines the causal impact of relaxing internal migration restrictions on the subjective well‐being (SWB) of urban natives. Taking China's 2014 household registration (hukou) system reform as a quasi‐natural experiment and combining data from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), we find that the reform has a significant negative impact on the SWB of urban natives. This effect is more pronounced for younger and lower‐income groups. Further analysis reveals that the hukou reforms deteriorate the labor market outcomes of natives, reduce their access to public services, and increase local crime rates and their risk of victimization. These results can be interpreted as potential mechanisms through which the relaxed internal migration restrictions negatively impact natives' SWB. Our findings provide valuable insights into the unintended consequences of migration policy reforms and highlight the need for balanced policy design to mitigate negative effects on host communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiliang Hu & Haiyang Lu & Keya Zeng, 2025. "The Impact of Relaxing Internal Migration Restrictions on Urban Natives' Subjective Well‐Being: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence From China's Hukou Reforms," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(5), pages 1468-1487, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:65:y:2025:i:5:p:1468-1487
    DOI: 10.1111/jors.70011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.70011
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jors.70011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:65:y:2025:i:5:p:1468-1487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-4146 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.