IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jpbect/v28y2026i5ne70137.html

Competing for Priorities in School Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Greg Leo
  • Martin Van der Linden

Abstract

We present a model in which students can influence their priorities in a school choice mechanism through a first‐stage contest. We show that efficiency improvements at the mechanism level can lead to net efficiency losses if they come at the price of increased allocative inequalities, intensifying competition in the contest. To demonstrate this potential tension, we apply these results to the deferred and immediate acceptance mechanisms ( DA $\mathrm{DA}$ and IA $\mathrm{IA}$) and show that there are conditions under which IA $\mathrm{IA}$ can yield higher net welfare than DA $\mathrm{DA}$, despite the allocative efficiency advantages of DA $\mathrm{DA}$ under these conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Greg Leo & Martin Van der Linden, 2026. "Competing for Priorities in School Choice," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 28(5), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:28:y:2026:i:5:n:e70137
    DOI: 10.1111/jpet.70137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70137
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jpet.70137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:28:y:2026:i:5:n:e70137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/apettea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.