IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jpbect/v28y2026i5ne70136.html

Mandated Annuitization, Gender‐Neutral Pricing, and the Possibility of Negative Correlation Between Risk Type and Purchase Level

Author

Listed:
  • Sau‐Him Paul Lau
  • Yinan Ying
  • Qilin Zhang

Abstract

Mandated annuitization is often proposed to eliminate the inefficiency caused by the positive correlation between risk type and purchase level in insurance markets. We revisit this solution in a mandatory annuity program with partial waiver, which is empirically relevant. With the standard assumptions of positive health—wealth correlation as well as gender gaps in health and wealth, we obtain two main results. First, under gender‐based pricing, the correlation of risk type and purchase level is still positive even though annuity purchases are mandatory. Second, based on decomposing the severity of distortion due to mandated annuitization under gender‐neutral pricing into the within‐group and between‐group effects, it is shown that risk type and purchase level may be negatively correlated if the between‐group effect is stronger than the within‐group effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Sau‐Him Paul Lau & Yinan Ying & Qilin Zhang, 2026. "Mandated Annuitization, Gender‐Neutral Pricing, and the Possibility of Negative Correlation Between Risk Type and Purchase Level," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 28(5), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:28:y:2026:i:5:n:e70136
    DOI: 10.1111/jpet.70136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70136
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jpet.70136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:28:y:2026:i:5:n:e70136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/apettea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.