IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jpbect/v28y2026i4ne70130.html

Measuring Hierarchy With Multiple Supervisors

Author

Listed:
  • Oriol Carbonell‐Nicolau

Abstract

This paper develops an axiomatic framework for measuring hierarchical structures in modern organizations, where multiple supervisors and non‐traditional arrangements, such as matrix structures, are common. Representing hierarchies as directed acyclic graphs, we show that structural flattening in these organizations is path‐dependent: determining hierarchical dominance generally requires explicitly tracing the sequence of subordination removals. We show that this complexity resolves in multipath‐free hierarchies. When each ordered pair of individuals is connected by at most one directed path, the effects of removal order leave a static footprint, allowing hierarchical dominance to be verified by a single geometric condition rather than a step‐by‐step procedure. Our axiomatic framework is grounded in Anonymity, the Replication Principle, and two versions of the Subordination Removal postulate. The distinction between baseline and Strong Subordination Removal clarifies whether redundant formal reporting lines contribute to measured hierarchical weight or instead leave the effective chain of command unchanged. Using this foundation, we characterize the hierarchical pre‐orders consistent with sequential subordination removal, including incomplete comparisons and complete extensions for organizations of varying sizes.

Suggested Citation

  • Oriol Carbonell‐Nicolau, 2026. "Measuring Hierarchy With Multiple Supervisors," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 28(4), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:28:y:2026:i:4:n:e70130
    DOI: 10.1111/jpet.70130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70130
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jpet.70130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:28:y:2026:i:4:n:e70130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/apettea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.