IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v68y2019i4p1111-1130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non‐parametric overdose control for dose finding in drug combination trials

Author

Listed:
  • Chi Kin Lam
  • Ruitao Lin
  • Guosheng Yin

Abstract

With the emergence of novel targeted anticancer agents, drug combinations have been recognized as cutting edge development in oncology. However, limited attention has been paid to overdose control in the existing drug combination dose finding methods which simultaneously find a set of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) combinations. To enhance patient safety, we develop the multiple‐agent non‐parametric overdose control (MANOC) design for identifying the MTD combination in phase I drug combination trials. By minimizing an asymmetric loss function, we control the probability of overdosing in a local region of the current dose combination. We further extend the MANOC design to identify the MTD contour by conducting a sequence of single‐agent subtrials with the dose level of one agent fixed. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the performance of the designs proposed. Although the MANOC design can prevent patients from being allocated to overtoxic dose levels, its accuracy and efficiency in dose finding remain competitive with existing methods. As an illustration, the MANOC design is applied to a phase I clinical trial for identifying the MTD combinations of buparlisib and trametinib.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi Kin Lam & Ruitao Lin & Guosheng Yin, 2019. "Non‐parametric overdose control for dose finding in drug combination trials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1111-1130, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:68:y:2019:i:4:p:1111-1130
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12349
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:68:y:2019:i:4:p:1111-1130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.