IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v68y2019i2p369-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint modelling of a binary and a continuous outcome measured at two cycles to determine the optimal dose

Author

Listed:
  • Monia Ezzalfani
  • Tomasz Burzykowski
  • Xavier Paoletti

Abstract

The optimal dose of targeted treatment in oncology may not be the maximal tolerated dose. Evaluating jointly toxicity and efficacy data is then desirable. We propose an adaptive dose finding approach to identify a dose based on repeated binary toxicity and continuous efficacy outcomes from the first two cycles. Probit and linear Gaussian models are used for the toxicity and efficacy at each cycle respectively. The correlation between toxicity and efficacy outcome is modelled via a latent Gaussian variable. Maximum likelihood estimators are used. Two steps in this design are defined: dose escalation with decision rules based only on toxicity observed at the first cycle; the expansion cohort with decision rules based on both repeated toxicity and efficacy outcomes by using the joint model. We perform simulation studies to assess the operating characteristics of our design. The design has good performance for different scenarios. The percentage of correct selection dose varies from 54% to 84%. There is no effect on the estimation parameters with missing data of toxicity or efficacy at cycle 2. The design then has similar performance. Using repeated toxicity and efficacy data in dose finding trials provides more reliable information to estimate the optimal dose for further trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Monia Ezzalfani & Tomasz Burzykowski & Xavier Paoletti, 2019. "Joint modelling of a binary and a continuous outcome measured at two cycles to determine the optimal dose," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(2), pages 369-384, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:68:y:2019:i:2:p:369-384
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12305
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:68:y:2019:i:2:p:369-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.