IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v67y2018i4p1047-1069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power and commensurate priors for synthesizing aggregate and individual patient level data in network meta‐analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hwanhee Hong
  • Haoda Fu
  • Bradley P. Carlin

Abstract

In network meta‐analysis, it is often desirable to synthesize different types of studies, featuring aggregated data and individual patient level data. However, existing methods do not sufficiently consider the quality of studies across different types of data and assume that the treatment effects are exchangeable across all studies regardless of these types. We propose Bayesian hierarchical network meta‐analysis models that allow us to borrow information adaptively across aggregated data and individual patient level data studies by using power and commensurate priors. The power parameter in the power priors and spike‐and‐slab hyperprior in the commensurate priors govern the level of borrowing information among study types. We incorporate covariate‐by‐treatment interactions to deliver personalized decision making and model any ecological fallacy. The methods are validated and compared via extensive simulation studies and then applied to an example in diabetes treatment comparing 28 oral antidiabetic drugs. We compare results across model and hyperprior specifications. Finally, we close with a discussion of our findings, limitations and future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Hwanhee Hong & Haoda Fu & Bradley P. Carlin, 2018. "Power and commensurate priors for synthesizing aggregate and individual patient level data in network meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1047-1069, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:67:y:2018:i:4:p:1047-1069
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:67:y:2018:i:4:p:1047-1069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.