IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v67y2018i2p395-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextual ranking by passive safety of generational classes of light vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Z. Ouni
  • C. Denis
  • C. Chauvel
  • A. Chambaz

Abstract

Each year, the Bulletin d’Analyse des Accidents Corporels (BAAC) data set gathers descriptions of traffic accidents on French public roads involving one or several light vehicles and injuring at least one of the passengers. Each light vehicle can be associated with its ‘generational class’ (GC), a raw description of the vehicle including its date of design, date of entry into service and size class. In two given contexts of accident, two light vehicles with two different GCs do not necessarily offer the same level of safety to their passengers. The objective of this study is to assess to what extent more recent generations of light vehicles are safer than older vehicles on the basis of the BAAC data set. We rely on ‘scoring’: we look for a score function that associates any context of accident and any GC with a real number in such a way that, the smaller is this number, the safer is the GC in the given context. A better score function is learned from the BAAC data set by cross‐validation, under the form of an optimal convex combination of score functions produced by a library of ranking algorithms by scoring. An oracle inequality illustrates the performances of the resulting meta‐algorithm. We implement it, apply it and show some results.

Suggested Citation

  • Z. Ouni & C. Denis & C. Chauvel & A. Chambaz, 2018. "Contextual ranking by passive safety of generational classes of light vehicles," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 395-416, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:67:y:2018:i:2:p:395-416
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:67:y:2018:i:2:p:395-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.