IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v67y2018i2p371-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mediation analysis for count and zero‐inflated count data without sequential ignorability and its application in dental studies

Author

Listed:
  • Zijian Guo
  • Dylan S. Small
  • Stuart A. Gansky
  • Jing Cheng

Abstract

Mediation analysis seeks to understand the mechanism by which a treatment affects an outcome. Count or zero‐inflated count outcomes are common in many studies in which mediation analysis is of interest. For example, in dental studies, outcomes such as the number of decayed, missing and filled teeth are typically zero inflated. Existing mediation analysis approaches for count data often assume sequential ignorability of the mediator. This is often not plausible because the mediator is not randomized so unmeasured confounders are associated with the mediator and the outcome. We develop causal methods based on instrumental variable approaches for mediation analysis for count data possibly with many 0s that do not require the assumption of sequential ignorability. We first define the direct and indirect effect ratios for those data, and then we propose estimating equations and use empirical likelihood to estimate the direct and indirect effects consistently. A sensitivity analysis is proposed for violations of the instrumental variables exclusion restriction assumption. Simulation studies demonstrate that our method works well for different types of outcome under various settings. Our method is applied to a randomized dental caries prevention trial and a study of the effect of a massive flood in Bangladesh on children's diarrhoea.

Suggested Citation

  • Zijian Guo & Dylan S. Small & Stuart A. Gansky & Jing Cheng, 2018. "Mediation analysis for count and zero‐inflated count data without sequential ignorability and its application in dental studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 371-394, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:67:y:2018:i:2:p:371-394
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12233
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcelo Bourguignon & Rodrigo M. R. Medeiros, 2022. "A simple and useful regression model for fitting count data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 790-827, September.
    2. Zhichao Jiang & Shu Yang & Peng Ding, 2022. "Multiply robust estimation of causal effects under principal ignorability," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1423-1445, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:67:y:2018:i:2:p:371-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.