IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v64y2015i5p711-730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the type and timing of consecutive events: application to predicting preterm birth in repeated pregnancies

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna H. Shih
  • Paul S. Albert
  • Pauline Mendola
  • Katherine L. Grantz

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="rssc12100-abs-0001"> Predicting the occurrence and timing of adverse pregnancy events such as preterm birth is an important analytical challenge in obstetrical practice. Developing statistical approaches that can be used to assess the risk and timing of these adverse events will provide clinicians with tools for individualized risk assessment that account for a woman's prior pregnancy history. Often adverse pregnancy outcomes are subject to competing events; for example, interest may focus on the occurrence of pre-eclampsia-related preterm birth, where preterm birth for other reasons may serve as a competing event. We propose modelling the type and timing of adverse outcomes in repeated pregnancies. We formulate a joint model, where types of adverse outcomes across repeated pregnancies are modelled by using a polychotomous logistic regression model with random effects, and gestational ages at delivery are modelled conditionally on the types of adverse outcome. The correlation between gestational ages conditional on the adverse pregnancies is modelled by the semiparametric normal copula function. We present a two-stage estimation method and develop the asymptotic theory for the estimators proposed. The model and estimation procedure proposed are applied to the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development consecutive pregnancies study data and evaluated by simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna H. Shih & Paul S. Albert & Pauline Mendola & Katherine L. Grantz, 2015. "Modelling the type and timing of consecutive events: application to predicting preterm birth in repeated pregnancies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(5), pages 711-730, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:64:y:2015:i:5:p:711-730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssc.2015.64.issue-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:64:y:2015:i:5:p:711-730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.