IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v64y2015i2p339-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint analysis of longitudinal and survival data measured on nested timescales by using shared parameter models: an application to fecundity data

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander C. McLain
  • Rajeshwari Sundaram
  • Germaine M. Buck Louis

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="rssc12075-abs-0001"> We consider the joint modelling, analysis and prediction of a longitudinal binary process and a discrete time-to-event outcome. We consider data from a prospective pregnancy study, which provides day level information regarding the behaviour of couples attempting to conceive. Reproductive epidemiologists are particularly interested in developing a model for individualized predictions of time to pregnancy (TTP). A couple's intercourse behaviour should be an integral part of such a model and is one of the main focuses of the paper. In our motivating data, the intercourse observations are a long series of binary data with a periodic probability of success and the amount of available intercourse data is a function of both the menstrual cycle length and TTP. Moreover, these variables are dependent and observed on different, and nested, timescales (TTP is measured in menstrual cycles whereas intercourse is measured on days within a menstrual cycle) further complicating its analysis. Here, we propose a semiparametric shared parameter model for the joint modelling of the binary longitudinal data (intercourse behaviour) and the discrete survival outcome (TTP). Further, we develop couple-based dynamic predictions for the intercourse profiles, which in turn are used to assess the risk for subfertility (i.e. TTP longer than six menstrual cycles).

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander C. McLain & Rajeshwari Sundaram & Germaine M. Buck Louis, 2015. "Joint analysis of longitudinal and survival data measured on nested timescales by using shared parameter models: an application to fecundity data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(2), pages 339-357, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:64:y:2015:i:2:p:339-357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssc.2015.64.issue-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:64:y:2015:i:2:p:339-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.