IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v64y2015i1p191-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global permutation tests for multivariate ordinal data: alternatives, test statistics and the null dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Jelizarow
  • Alarcos Cieza
  • Ulrich Mansmann

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="rssc12070-abs-0001"> We discuss two-sample global permutation tests for sets of multivariate ordinal data in possibly high dimensional set-ups, motivated by the analysis of data collected by means of the World Health Organization's ‘International classification of functioning, disability and health’. The tests do not require any modelling of the multivariate dependence structure. Specifically, we consider testing for marginal inhomogeneity and direction-independent marginal order. As opposed to max-T-tests, which are known to have good power against alternatives with few strong individual effects, the tests proposed have good power against alternatives with many weak individual effects. Permutation tests are valid only if the two multivariate distributions are identical under the null hypothesis. By means of simulations, we examine the practical effect of violations of this exchangeability condition. Our simulations suggest that theoretically invalid permutation tests can still be ‘practically valid’. In particular, they suggest that the degree of the permutation procedure's failure may be considered as a function of the difference in group-specific covariance matrices, the proportion between group sizes, the number of variables in the set, the test statistic used and the number of levels per variable.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Jelizarow & Alarcos Cieza & Ulrich Mansmann, 2015. "Global permutation tests for multivariate ordinal data: alternatives, test statistics and the null dilemma," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(1), pages 191-213, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:64:y:2015:i:1:p:191-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssc.2014.64.issue-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:64:y:2015:i:1:p:191-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.