IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v55y2006i5p615-630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modifying a central composite design to model the process mean and variance when there are hard‐to‐change factors

Author

Listed:
  • Scott M. Kowalski
  • G. Geoffrey Vining
  • Douglas C. Montgomery
  • Connie M. Borror

Abstract

Summary. An important question within industrial statistics is how to find operating conditions that achieve some goal for the mean of a characteristic of interest while simultaneously minimizing the characteristic's process variance. Often, people refer to this kind of situation as the robust parameter design problem. The robust parameter design literature is rich with ways to create separate models for the mean and variance from this type of experiment. Many times time and/or cost constraints force certain factors of interest to be much more difficult to change than others. An appropriate approach to such an experiment restricts the randomization, which leads to a split‐plot structure. The paper modifies the central composite design to allow the estimation of separate models for the characteristic's mean and variances under a split‐plot structure. The paper goes on to discuss an appropriate analysis of the experimental results. It illustrates the methodology with an industrial experiment involving a chemical vapour deposition process for the manufacture of silicon wafers. The methodology was used to achieve a silicon layer thickness value of 485 Å while minimizing the process variation.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott M. Kowalski & G. Geoffrey Vining & Douglas C. Montgomery & Connie M. Borror, 2006. "Modifying a central composite design to model the process mean and variance when there are hard‐to‐change factors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 55(5), pages 615-630, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:55:y:2006:i:5:p:615-630
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2006.00556.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2006.00556.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2006.00556.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:55:y:2006:i:5:p:615-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.