IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v53y2004i1p63-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tests for a difference in timing of physiological response between two brain regions measured by using functional magnetic resonance imaging

Author

Listed:
  • S. Landau
  • I. C. Ellison‐Wright
  • E. T. Bullmore

Abstract

Summary. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) measures the physiological response of the human brain to experimentally controlled stimulation. In a periodically designed experiment it is of interest to test for a difference in the timing (phase shift) of the response between two anatomically distinct brain regions. We suggest two tests for an interregional difference in phase shift: one based on asymptotic theory and one based on bootstrapping. Whilst the two procedures differ in some of their assumptions, both tests rely on employing the large number of voxels (three‐dimensional pixels) in non‐activated brain regions to take account of spatial autocorrelation between voxelwise phase shift observations within the activated regions of interest. As an example we apply both tests, and their counterparts assuming spatial independence, to FMRI phase shift data that were acquired from a normal young woman during performance of a periodically designed covert verbal fluency task. We conclude that it is necessary to take account of spatial autocovariance between voxelwise FMRI time series parameter estimates such as the phase shift, and that the most promising way of achieving this is by modelling the spatial autocorrelation structure from a suitably defined base region of the image slice.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Landau & I. C. Ellison‐Wright & E. T. Bullmore, 2004. "Tests for a difference in timing of physiological response between two brain regions measured by using functional magnetic resonance imaging," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 53(1), pages 63-82, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:53:y:2004:i:1:p:63-82
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0035-9254.2003.04844.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0035-9254.2003.04844.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0035-9254.2003.04844.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:53:y:2004:i:1:p:63-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.