IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v50y2001i3p389-401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case–control studies with complex sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Alastair Scott
  • Chris Wild

Abstract

The use of complex sampling designs in population‐based case–control studies is becoming more common, particularly for sampling the control population. This is prompted by all the usual cost and logistical benefits that are conferred by multistage sampling. Complex sampling has often been ignored in analysis but, with the advent of packages like SUDAAN, survey‐weighted analyses that take account of the sample design can be carried out routinely. This paper explores this approach and more efficient alternatives, which can also be implemented by using readily available software.

Suggested Citation

  • Alastair Scott & Chris Wild, 2001. "Case–control studies with complex sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 50(3), pages 389-401.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:50:y:2001:i:3:p:389-401
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9876.00242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00242
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9876.00242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brady Ryan & Ananthika Nirmalkanna & Candemir Cigsar & Yildiz E. Yilmaz, 2023. "Evaluation of Designs and Estimation Methods Under Response-Dependent Two-Phase Sampling for Genetic Association Studies," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 15(2), pages 510-539, July.
    2. Y. Huang & M. S. Pepe, 2010. "Semiparametric methods for evaluating the covariate‐specific predictiveness of continuous markers in matched case–control studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(3), pages 437-456, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:50:y:2001:i:3:p:389-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.