IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v50y2001i3p325-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the effect of the number of quadrature points in a logistic random effects model: an example

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Lesaffre
  • Bart Spiessens

Abstract

Although generalized linear mixed models are recognized to be of major practical importance, it is also known that they can be computationally demanding. The problem is the evaluation of the integral in calculating the marginalized likelihood. The straightforward method is based on the Gauss–Hermite technique, based on Gaussian quadrature points. Another approach is provided by the class of penalized quasi‐likelihood methods. It is commonly believed that the Gauss–Hermite method works relatively well in simple situations but fails in more complicated structures. However, we present here a strikingly simple example of a logistic random‐intercepts model in the context of a longitudinal clinical trial where the method gives valid results only for a high number of quadrature points (Q). As a consequence, this result warns the practitioner to examine routinely the dependence of the results on Q. The adaptive Gaussian quadrature, as implemented in the new SAS procedure NLMIXED, offered the solution to our problem. However, even the adaptive version of Gaussian quadrature needs careful handling to ensure convergence.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Lesaffre & Bart Spiessens, 2001. "On the effect of the number of quadrature points in a logistic random effects model: an example," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 50(3), pages 325-335.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:50:y:2001:i:3:p:325-335
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9876.00237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00237
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9876.00237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:50:y:2001:i:3:p:325-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.