IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v50y2001i2p171-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible estimates of tumour incidence for intermediately lethal tumours in a typical long‐term animal bioassay

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Parise
  • Gregg E. Dinse
  • Louise M. Ryan

Abstract

The estimation of the incidence of tumours in an animal carcinogenicity study is complicated by the occult nature of the tumours involved (i.e. tumours are not observable before an animal's death). Also, the lethality of tumours is generally unknown, making the tumour incidence function non‐identifiable without interim sacrifices, cause‐of‐death data or modelling assumptions. Although Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival are typically displayed, obtaining analogous plots for tumour incidence generally requires fairly elaborate model fitting. We present a case‐study of tetrafluoroethylene to illustrate a simple method for estimating the incidence of tumours as a function of more easily estimable components. One of the components, tumour prevalence, is modelled by using a generalized additive model, which leads to estimates that are more flexible than those derived under the usual parametric models. A multiplicative assumption for tumour lethality allows for the incorporation of concomitant information, such as the size of tumours. Our approach requires only terminal sacrifice data although additional sacrifice data are easily accommodated. Simulations are used to illustrate the estimator proposed and to evaluate its properties. The method also yields a simple summary measure of tumour lethality, which can be helpful in interpreting the results of a study.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Parise & Gregg E. Dinse & Louise M. Ryan, 2001. "Flexible estimates of tumour incidence for intermediately lethal tumours in a typical long‐term animal bioassay," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 50(2), pages 171-185.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:50:y:2001:i:2:p:171-185
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9876.00227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00227
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9876.00227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:50:y:2001:i:2:p:171-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.