IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v43y1994i4p653-666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Maximum Oxygen Uptake — a Case‐Study in Nonlinear Regression Model Formulation and Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Alan M. Nevill
  • Roger L. Holder

Abstract

This case‐study outlines the important stages that needed to be addressed when formulating a regression model to explain health‐related variables, such as maximum oxygen uptake, taken from the Allied Dunbar national fitness survey. Relevant references suggested two competing models. A nonlinear regression model, originally proposed to predict forced expiratory volume, appeared to be equally suitable for predicting the estimated maximum oxygen uptake. However, the parsimonious solution was found to be inexplicable on physiological grounds, as well as providing heteroscedastic and non‐normal residuals. An alternative weighted log‐linear regression model, containing a proportional body weight and a negative exponential age term, was then considered. This model gave more plausible and precise parameter estimates which had a generally lower level of intercorrelation. The log‐linear model also gave less evidence of multicollinearity and the residuals were found to be acceptably normal. Finally, a bootstrap comparison of likelihoods confirmed the log‐linear model to be superior.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan M. Nevill & Roger L. Holder, 1994. "Modelling Maximum Oxygen Uptake — a Case‐Study in Nonlinear Regression Model Formulation and Comparison," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 43(4), pages 653-666, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:43:y:1994:i:4:p:653-666
    DOI: 10.2307/2986263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2986263
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2986263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:43:y:1994:i:4:p:653-666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.