IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v26y1977i3p321-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of Defining Contrasts and Confounded Effects in Two‐Level Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • M. F. Franklin
  • R. A. Bailey

Abstract

In factorial experiments the selection of defining contrasts and effects to be confounded with blocks is not always straightforward and plans presented in standard texts are not necessarily suitable. A systematic procedure for selecting suitable defining contrasts has been presented by Greenfield (1976). In this paper we show that Greenfield's algorithm does not always generate the smallest possible fraction, and give a more general procedure which is suitable for selecting defining contrasts and confounded effects.

Suggested Citation

  • M. F. Franklin & R. A. Bailey, 1977. "Selection of Defining Contrasts and Confounded Effects in Two‐Level Experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 26(3), pages 321-326, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:26:y:1977:i:3:p:321-326
    DOI: 10.2307/2346973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2346973
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2346973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kobilinsky, André & Monod, Hervé & Bailey, R.A., 2017. "Automatic generation of generalised regular factorial designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 311-329.
    2. L. Rob Verdooren, 2020. "History of the Statistical Design of Agricultural Experiments," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 457-486, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:26:y:1977:i:3:p:321-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.