IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v23y1974i2p190-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing Binomial Data in a Two‐Factor Experiment with Unequal Observations Per Cell

Author

Listed:
  • D. F. Butcher
  • K. E. Kemp

Abstract

Binomial data were generated for a two‐factor experiment with both factors at three levels using unequal numbers of observations per cell. Three n‐patterns were used. The number of observations per cell ranged from 30 to 90 for two n‐patterns and from 38 to 98 for the third n‐pattern. The mean number of observations per cell was 60 for all n‐patterns. Samples were generated for values of μp of 0·05, 0·10, 0·15, 0·20, 0·30, 0·40 and 0·50 to determine the effects of n‐pattern and of the binomial parameter (μp) on α‐level for four methods of analysis. Methods of analysis considered were: two analyses of variance, one using percentage data; the other, the angular transformation for percentage data; a three‐factor χ2 analysis; and Friedman's (1937) non‐parametric two‐way analysis of variance. Because Friedman's test generally showed erratic α‐levels, no comparisons of power were made with Friedman's test. Of the remaining tests, the three‐factor χ2 was more powerful than the parametric analysis of variance procedures. There was no apparent difference between the parametric analyses of variance with respect to power, raising some doubt as to the usefulness of the arc‐sine transformation for percentage data.

Suggested Citation

  • D. F. Butcher & K. E. Kemp, 1974. "Analysing Binomial Data in a Two‐Factor Experiment with Unequal Observations Per Cell," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 23(2), pages 190-202, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:23:y:1974:i:2:p:190-202
    DOI: 10.2307/2346999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2346999
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2346999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:23:y:1974:i:2:p:190-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.