IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v11y1962i2p120-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of the Check‐List and the Open Response Questioning Systems

Author

Listed:
  • William Belson
  • Judith A. Duncan

Abstract

The check‐list and the open response systems of gathering information are compared with respect to yesterday's reading of newspapers and magazines and also with respect to yesterday's viewing. There is evidence of sharp differences between the yields from the two systems and also evidence of oddities within the yield from either of them. The findings appear to have important implications for current research practice.

Suggested Citation

  • William Belson & Judith A. Duncan, 1962. "A Comparison of the Check‐List and the Open Response Questioning Systems," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 11(2), pages 120-132, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:11:y:1962:i:2:p:120-132
    DOI: 10.2307/2985538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2985538
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2985538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wander Vaart & Johannes Zouwen & Wil Dijkstra, 1995. "Retrospective questions: data quality, task difficulty, and the use of a checklist," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 299-315, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:11:y:1962:i:2:p:120-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.