IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v80y2018i1p113-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goodness‐of‐fit tests for high dimensional linear models

Author

Listed:
  • Rajen D. Shah
  • Peter Bühlmann

Abstract

We propose a framework for constructing goodness‐of‐fit tests in both low and high dimensional linear models. We advocate applying regression methods to the scaled residuals following either an ordinary least squares or lasso fit to the data, and using some proxy for prediction error as the final test statistic. We call this family residual prediction tests. We show that simulation can be used to obtain the critical values for such tests in the low dimensional setting and demonstrate using both theoretical results and extensive numerical studies that some form of the parametric bootstrap can do the same when the high dimensional linear model is under consideration. We show that residual prediction tests can be used to test for significance of groups or individual variables as special cases, and here they compare favourably with state of the art methods, but we also argue that they can be designed to test for as diverse model misspecifications as heteroscedasticity and non‐linearity.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajen D. Shah & Peter Bühlmann, 2018. "Goodness‐of‐fit tests for high dimensional linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(1), pages 113-135, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:80:y:2018:i:1:p:113-135
    DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12234
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssb.12234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Choi, Woohyun & Kim, Ilmun, 2023. "Averaging p-values under exchangeability," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Jana Janková & Rajen D. Shah & Peter Bühlmann & Richard J. Samworth, 2020. "Goodness‐of‐fit testing in high dimensional generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(3), pages 773-795, July.
    3. Lorentz Jäntschi & Sorana D. Bolboacă, 2018. "Computation of Probability Associated with Anderson–Darling Statistic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Emre Demirkaya & Yang Feng & Pallavi Basu & Jinchi Lv, 2022. "Large-scale model selection in misspecified generalized linear models [Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 109(1), pages 123-136.
    5. Claude Renaux & Laura Buzdugan & Markus Kalisch & Peter Bühlmann, 2020. "Hierarchical inference for genome-wide association studies: a view on methodology with software," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 1-40, March.
    6. Ciuperca, Gabriela, 2021. "Variable selection in high-dimensional linear model with possibly asymmetric errors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Qi Zhang, 2022. "High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis with Applications to Causal Gene Identification," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 14(3), pages 432-451, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:80:y:2018:i:1:p:113-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.