IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v69y2007i3p447-461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coefficient sign prediction methods for model selection

Author

Listed:
  • David J. Nott
  • Anthony Y. C. Kuk

Abstract

Summary. We consider a Bayesian model selection strategy based on predicting the signs of the coefficients in a regression model, i.e. we consider identification of coefficients in a full or encompassing model for which we can confidently predict whether they are positive or negative. This is useful when our main purpose in doing model selection is interpretation, since the sign of a coefficient is often of primary importance for this task. In the case of a linear model with standard non‐informative prior, we connect our sign coefficient prediction approach to the classical Zheng–Loh procedure for model selection. One advantage of our approach is that only specification of a prior on the full model is required, unlike standard Bayesian variable selection approaches which require specification of prior distributions on parameters in all submodels, and specification of a prior on the model itself. We consider applying our method with proper hierarchical shrinkage priors, which makes the procedure more useful in ‘large p, small n’ regression problems with more predictors than observations and in problems involving multicollinearity. In these problems we may wish to do prediction by using shrinkage methods in the full model, but interpreting which variables are important is also of interest. We compare selection by using our coefficient sign prediction approach with the recently proposed elastic net procedure of Zou and Hastie and observe that our method shares some of the features of the elastic net such as a group selection property. The method can be extended to more complex model selection problems such as selection on variance components in random‐effects models. For selection on variance components where the parameter of interest is non‐negative and hence prediction of the sign of the parameter not the appropriate way to proceed, we consider instead prediction of the sign of the score component for the parameter at zero, obtaining a method that is related to classical score tests on variance components.

Suggested Citation

  • David J. Nott & Anthony Y. C. Kuk, 2007. "Coefficient sign prediction methods for model selection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(3), pages 447-461, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:69:y:2007:i:3:p:447-461
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00597.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00597.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00597.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:69:y:2007:i:3:p:447-461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.