IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/joares/v64y2026i4p1645-1684.html

A Tale of Two Banks: When Credit Loss Models Meet Economic Crises

Author

Listed:
  • CHEN CHEN
  • DIFANG HUANG

Abstract

Policy makers and researchers are concerned that the expected credit loss (ECL) approach may exacerbate procyclicality. Using administrative loan‐level and firm‐level data in China, we find that banks adopting the ECL model reduced their credit supply and became more prudent in lending decisions after the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic, compared to banks using the incurred credit loss (ICL) approach. Our findings are more pronounced for banks that experienced greater loan loss provisions induced by ECL and for firms with higher credit risk. The credit contraction persisted throughout our sample period. We further document that firms more exposed to ECL banks experienced larger reductions in loans, assets, liabilities, and revenue after the pandemic began than those more exposed to ICL banks. These findings support the conjecture that the ECL approach may exacerbate procyclicality.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Chen & Difang Huang, 2026. "A Tale of Two Banks: When Credit Loss Models Meet Economic Crises," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 64(4), pages 1645-1684, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:64:y:2026:i:4:p:1645-1684
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.70030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.70030
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-679X.70030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:64:y:2026:i:4:p:1645-1684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1475679x .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.