IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/joares/v64y2026i3p1287-1331.html

AI Democratization and Trading Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • ANNE YANRU CHANG
  • XI DONG
  • XIUMIN MARTIN
  • CHANGYUN ZHOU

Abstract

We are among the first to investigate how Generative AI (GenAI) shapes investors' trading activities. Using an AI‐sentiment measure extracted from earnings‐call transcripts to proxy for textual signals, we find notable shifts in trading behaviors around earnings calls. Before the wide deployment of ChatGPT, short selling was aligned with AI‐sentiment, whereas retail trading was not. However, following ChatGPT's deployment, the alignment of retail traders with AI‐sentiment significantly increases, while the alignment of short sellers weakens, albeit insignificantly. Stocks with higher information processing costs exhibit a more pronounced increase in retail trading alignment, scenarios where retail investors are likely to benefit more from AI. Using retail‐AI alignment as a proxy for the extent to which retail investors trade based on AI signals, we show that information asymmetry declines and retail investors' trading profitability improves, whereas short sale profitability declines in high retail‐AI alignment stocks. Exogenous outages reduce the alignment between retail trading and AI‐sentiment, allowing us to draw causal inferences. Collectively, this study suggests that AI is a promising technology for narrowing the information gap in the trading of complex textual financial disclosures between investor classes with clear disparities in the ability to process public disclosures.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Yanru Chang & Xi Dong & Xiumin Martin & Changyun Zhou, 2026. "AI Democratization and Trading Inequality," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 64(3), pages 1287-1331, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:64:y:2026:i:3:p:1287-1331
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-679x.70063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.70063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-679x.70063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:64:y:2026:i:3:p:1287-1331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1475679x .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.