IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/joares/v64y2026i2p885-922.html

Inheriting Versus Developing Data Analytic Tests and Auditors’ Professional Skepticism

Author

Listed:
  • XIAOXING LI
  • JOSEPH F. BRAZEL
  • ANNA GOLD
  • JUSTIN LEIBY

Abstract

As the use of audit data analytic tests (ADA) becomes increasingly established in practice, auditors will often confront situations in which they inherit ADA developed by others, as opposed to developing the ADA themselves. Despite the potential benefits of ADA, inheriting ADA could decrease auditors’ skeptical actions by diminishing their psychological ownership of the ADA. In an experiment where an ADA identifies a fraud red flag, we find that auditors who inherited the ADA are less likely to exercise skeptical actions than those who were personally involved in its development. We then provide evidence that informing auditors who inherit an ADA about the test development activities (e.g., a brief memorandum documenting the ADA's development) mitigates the negative effect of inheriting the ADA. Evidence from mediation analyses suggests that these effects are driven by decreased psychological ownership when auditors inherit the ADA.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoxing Li & Joseph F. Brazel & Anna Gold & Justin Leiby, 2026. "Inheriting Versus Developing Data Analytic Tests and Auditors’ Professional Skepticism," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 64(2), pages 885-922, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:64:y:2026:i:2:p:885-922
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.70014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.70014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-679X.70014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:64:y:2026:i:2:p:885-922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1475679x .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.