IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v76y2025i9p1188-1209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The woman researcher's tale: A review of bibliometric methods and results for studying gender in science

Author

Listed:
  • Elvira González‐Salmón
  • Zaida Chinchilla‐Rodríguez
  • Nicolas Robinson‐Garcia

Abstract

There has been a notable increase in bibliometric research studying gender in academia. This narrative review aims to organize and synthesize this extensive body of work to uncover new insights into gender disparities in science. We begin by analyzing key methodological elements, including gender assignment techniques, units of analysis, and causality issues. Next, we identify and categorize the main findings of the literature into three groups: differences in academia, causes behind these differences, and their primary consequences. Finally, we point out gaps in the literature and propose new lines of inquiry to address these gaps. These proposals include more rigorous gender assignment algorithms, fostering comparability of studies, exploring a broader range of topics, and improving the interpretability and context of results when studying gender.

Suggested Citation

  • Elvira González‐Salmón & Zaida Chinchilla‐Rodríguez & Nicolas Robinson‐Garcia, 2025. "The woman researcher's tale: A review of bibliometric methods and results for studying gender in science," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 76(9), pages 1188-1209, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:9:p:1188-1209
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.25012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.25012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.25012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:9:p:1188-1209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.