IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v76y2025i8p1105-1122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The botization of science? Large‐scale study of the presence and impact of Twitter bots in science dissemination

Author

Listed:
  • Wenceslao Arroyo‐Machado
  • Enrique Herrera‐Viedma
  • Daniel Torres‐Salinas

Abstract

The rise of social media has brought new dynamics to the dissemination of scientific research, with Twitter (X) playing a significant role. This study focuses on the role of social bots—automated accounts designed to mimic human behavior and amplify content—in scientific communication. By analyzing over 3.7 million papers published between 2017 and 2021 and their 51 million Twitter mentions. Using a novel hybrid method that includes BotometerLite and specific activity parameters, with verification via a robustness check, it was found that 0.23% of accounts were bots. Despite their small numbers, these bots contributed to 4.72% of all mentions, indicating a significant presence, but with varied impact. Bots were particularly active in Mathematics, Physics, and Space Sciences, where they generated over 70% of tweets in some cases. Automated accounts disproportionately influence the visibility and perceived impact of research in these disciplines, which underscores the need for discipline‐specific analysis when considering Twitter's role in scientific communication. This large‐scale study highlights the potential for bots to skew altmetric indicators, misleading stakeholders about true engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenceslao Arroyo‐Machado & Enrique Herrera‐Viedma & Daniel Torres‐Salinas, 2025. "The botization of science? Large‐scale study of the presence and impact of Twitter bots in science dissemination," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 76(8), pages 1105-1122, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:8:p:1105-1122
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24998
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:8:p:1105-1122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.