IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v76y2025i13p1743-1753.html

The elusive essence: A philosophical interrogation of phenomenon‐based knowledge organization

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Thellefsen

Abstract

Phenomenon‐based classification (PBC) systems are gaining renewed interest for their potential to facilitate interdisciplinary research. This paper acknowledges the practical advantages highlighted by proponents but critically examines the underlying philosophical assumptions concerning the nature of “phenomena.” Drawing on insights from the philosophy of science, semiotics of information, and domain analysis, this paper argues that PBC is caught in a foundational paradox: its ambition to classify phenomena irrespective of context is implicitly essentialist, while its method for defining those phenomena is necessarily constructivist, relying on social consensus. This unexamined tension between its goals and its practice is a significant theoretical weakness. Understanding this philosophical conflict is crucial for developing more epistemologically robust and truly interoperable knowledge organization systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Thellefsen, 2025. "The elusive essence: A philosophical interrogation of phenomenon‐based knowledge organization," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 76(13), pages 1743-1753, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:13:p:1743-1753
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.70031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.70031
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.70031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:13:p:1743-1753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.