IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v76y2025i11p1532-1552.html

Which is the cited source? A new perspective on article evaluation based on semantic similarity—Citation contribution attribution

Author

Listed:
  • Siluo Yang
  • Lijuan Wu
  • Biyao Wu
  • Yanhui Song

Abstract

Citation analysis, an essential method in bibliometrics and scientometrics, has been widely applied to assess scholarly publications. Traditionally, studies attribute citation contributions directly to cited papers, overlooking indirect citations. Citation cascade research improves on this by assuming papers inherit contributions from their citation generations but does not consider the source of the citation content (CC). We argue that citation contributions should be attributed to the source of the CC, which includes not only the cited paper but also its references. This study introduces a semantic similarity‐driven approach (CCA_SSRS) to allocate citation contributions. CCA_SSRS evaluates semantic similarity between CC in the citing paper (CCFP) and the reference span in the cited paper (RSFP), as well as between CCFP and CCs associated with the cited paper's references (CCFP_R). If similarity between CCFP and CCFP_Ri exceeds or equals that between CCFP and RSFP, the i‐th reference is credited; otherwise, the cited paper receives full credit. Tested on the CL‐SciSumm 2017 dataset, CCA_SSRS outperformed three established methods in identifying implicit cited sources, enabling references to receive varying contributions based on semantic similarity. This study highlights the significant impact of citation contribution attribution on paper evaluation and ranking.

Suggested Citation

  • Siluo Yang & Lijuan Wu & Biyao Wu & Yanhui Song, 2025. "Which is the cited source? A new perspective on article evaluation based on semantic similarity—Citation contribution attribution," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 76(11), pages 1532-1552, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:11:p:1532-1552
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.70012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.70012
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.70012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:11:p:1532-1552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.