IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v76y2025i10p1396-1410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do authors perceive the way their work is cited? Findings from a large‐scale survey on quotation accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Wakeling
  • Monica Lestari Paramita
  • Stephen Pinfield

Abstract

It has long been recognized that there are issues with the appropriateness of citations in the academic literature. Citations of sources that do not support the statement they are cited against are known as quotation errors, and there have been many previous studies of their prevalence. The vast majority of these studies rely on researchers evaluating the accuracy of citations in a small sample of the literature, and show large variation in quotation error rates. In this article we report a novel approach to assessing quotation accuracy via an online survey in which 2648 corresponding authors of articles evaluated a real‐world citation of their work. Respondents were also asked to categorize the perceived purpose of the citation, and what action, if any, they take when encountering inaccurate citations of their work. We found a quotation error rate of 16.6%, with no significant difference across academic disciplines, suggesting that variation in previous studies may be a result of methodological differences. Only 11.3% of respondents indicated they had taken action after encountering an inaccurate citation of their work. This work reveals reasons contributing to inaccurate quotations and issues with citation practices, and offers suggestions of areas for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Wakeling & Monica Lestari Paramita & Stephen Pinfield, 2025. "How do authors perceive the way their work is cited? Findings from a large‐scale survey on quotation accuracy," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 76(10), pages 1396-1410, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:10:p:1396-1410
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.70000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.70000
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.70000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:10:p:1396-1410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.