IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v71y2020i4p450-461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Viewpoints in indexing term assignment

Author

Listed:
  • David Bodoff
  • Yaffa Richter‐Levin

Abstract

The literature on assigned indexing considers three possible viewpoints—the author's viewpoint as evidenced in the title, the users' viewpoint, and the indexer's viewpoint—and asks whether and which of those views should be reflected in an indexer's choice of terms to assign to an item. We study this question empirically, as opposed to normatively. Based on the literature that discusses whose viewpoints should be reflected, we construct a research model that includes those same three viewpoints as factors that might be influencing term assignment in actual practice. In the unique study design that we employ, the records of term assignments made by identified indexers in academic libraries are cross‐referenced with the results of a survey that those same indexers completed on political views. Our results indicate that in our setting, variance in term assignment was best explained by indexers' personal political views. © 2019 ASIS&T

Suggested Citation

  • David Bodoff & Yaffa Richter‐Levin, 2020. "Viewpoints in indexing term assignment," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(4), pages 450-461, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:71:y:2020:i:4:p:450-461
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24246
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:71:y:2020:i:4:p:450-461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.