IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v70y2019i9p917-930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating neurophysiologic relevance feedback in intent modeling for information retrieval

Author

Listed:
  • Giulio Jacucci
  • Oswald Barral
  • Pedram Daee
  • Markus Wenzel
  • Baris Serim
  • Tuukka Ruotsalo
  • Patrik Pluchino
  • Jonathan Freeman
  • Luciano Gamberini
  • Samuel Kaski
  • Benjamin Blankertz

Abstract

The use of implicit relevance feedback from neurophysiology could deliver effortless information retrieval. However, both computing neurophysiologic responses and retrieving documents are characterized by uncertainty because of noisy signals and incomplete or inconsistent representations of the data. We present the first‐of‐its‐kind, fully integrated information retrieval system that makes use of online implicit relevance feedback generated from brain activity as measured through electroencephalography (EEG), and eye movements. The findings of the evaluation experiment (N = 16) show that we are able to compute online neurophysiology‐based relevance feedback with performance significantly better than chance in complex data domains and realistic search tasks. We contribute by demonstrating how to integrate in interactive intent modeling this inherently noisy implicit relevance feedback combined with scarce explicit feedback. Although experimental measures of task performance did not allow us to demonstrate how the classification outcomes translated into search task performance, the experiment proved that our approach is able to generate relevance feedback from brain signals and eye movements in a realistic scenario, thus providing promising implications for future work in neuroadaptive information retrieval (IR).

Suggested Citation

  • Giulio Jacucci & Oswald Barral & Pedram Daee & Markus Wenzel & Baris Serim & Tuukka Ruotsalo & Patrik Pluchino & Jonathan Freeman & Luciano Gamberini & Samuel Kaski & Benjamin Blankertz, 2019. "Integrating neurophysiologic relevance feedback in intent modeling for information retrieval," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(9), pages 917-930, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:9:p:917-930
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24161
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:9:p:917-930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.