IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v70y2019i8p858-871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated language‐independent authorship verification (for Indo‐European languages)

Author

Listed:
  • Sasa Adamovic
  • Vladislav Miskovic
  • Milan Milosavljevic
  • Marko Sarac
  • Mladen Veinovic

Abstract

In this article we examine automated language‐independent authorship verification using text examples in several representative Indo‐European languages, in cases when the examined texts belong to an open set of authors, that is, the author is unknown. We showcase the set of developed language‐dependent and language‐independent features, the model of training examples, consisting of pairs of equal features for known and unknown texts, and the appropriate method of authorship verification. An authorship verification accuracy greater than 90% was accomplished via the application of stylometric methods on four different languages (English, Greek, Spanish, and Dutch, while the verification for Dutch is slightly lower). For the multilingual case, the highest authorship verification accuracy using basic machine‐learning methods, over 90%, was achieved by the application of the kNN and SVM‐SMO methods, using the feature selection method SVM‐RFE. The improvement in authorship verification accuracy in multilingual cases, over 94%, was accomplished via ensemble learning methods, with the MultiboostAB method being a bit more accurate, but Random Forest is generally more appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • Sasa Adamovic & Vladislav Miskovic & Milan Milosavljevic & Marko Sarac & Mladen Veinovic, 2019. "Automated language‐independent authorship verification (for Indo‐European languages)," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(8), pages 858-871, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:8:p:858-871
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catherine Ikae & Jacques Savoy, 2022. "Gender identification on Twitter," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(1), pages 58-69, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:8:p:858-871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.