IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v70y2019i5p526-529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simplified Scheme of Search Task Difficulty Reasons

Author

Listed:
  • Jingjing Liu
  • Yuan Li
  • Samantha K. Hastings

Abstract

This article reports on a study that aimed at simplifying a search task difficulty reason scheme. Liu, Kim, and Creel (2015) (denoted LKC15) developed a 21‐item search task difficulty reason scheme using a controlled laboratory experiment. The current study simplified the scheme through another experiment that followed the same design as LKC15 and involved 32 university students. The study had one added questionnaire item that provided a list of the 21 difficulty reasons in the multiple‐choice format. By comparing the current study with LKC15, a concept of primary top difficulty reasons was proposed, which reasonably simplified the 21‐item scheme to an 8‐item top reason list. This limited number of reasons is more manageable and makes it feasible for search systems to predict task difficulty reasons from observable user behaviors, which builds the basis for systems to improve user satisfaction based on predicted search difficulty reasons.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingjing Liu & Yuan Li & Samantha K. Hastings, 2019. "Simplified Scheme of Search Task Difficulty Reasons," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(5), pages 526-529, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:5:p:526-529
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24125
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:5:p:526-529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.