IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v70y2019i2p187-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing neural‐ and N‐gram‐based language models for word segmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Yerai Doval
  • Carlos Gómez‐Rodríguez

Abstract

Word segmentation is the task of inserting or deleting word boundary characters in order to separate character sequences that correspond to words in some language. In this article we propose an approach based on a beam search algorithm and a language model working at the byte/character level, the latter component implemented either as an n‐gram model or a recurrent neural network. The resulting system analyzes the text input with no word boundaries one token at a time, which can be a character or a byte, and uses the information gathered by the language model to determine if a boundary must be placed in the current position or not. Our aim is to use this system in a preprocessing step for a microtext normalization system. This means that it needs to effectively cope with the data sparsity present on this kind of texts. We also strove to surpass the performance of two readily available word segmentation systems: The well‐known and accessible Word Breaker by Microsoft, and the Python module WordSegment by Grant Jenks. The results show that we have met our objectives, and we hope to continue to improve both the precision and the efficiency of our system in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Yerai Doval & Carlos Gómez‐Rodríguez, 2019. "Comparing neural‐ and N‐gram‐based language models for word segmentation," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(2), pages 187-197, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:2:p:187-197
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24082
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:2:p:187-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.