IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v70y2019i1p61-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative assessment of the difficulty of authorship attribution in Greek and in English

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Juola
  • George K. Mikros
  • Sean Vinsick

Abstract

Authorship attribution is an important problem in text classification, with many applications and a substantial body of research activity. Among the research findings are that many different methods will work, including a number of methods that are superficially language‐independent (such as an analysis of the most common “words” or “character n‐grams” in a document). Since all languages have words (and all written languages have characters), this method could (in theory) work on any language. However, it is not clear that the methods that work best on, for example English, would also work best on other languages. It is not even clear that the same level of performance is achievable in different languages, even under identical conditions. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to achieve “identical conditions” in practice. A new corpus, developed by George Mikros, provides very tight controls not only for author but also for topic, thus enabling a direct comparison of performance levels between the two languages Greek and English. We compare a number of different methods head‐to‐head on this corpus, and show that, overall, performance on English is higher than performance on Greek, often highly significantly so.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Juola & George K. Mikros & Sean Vinsick, 2019. "A comparative assessment of the difficulty of authorship attribution in Greek and in English," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(1), pages 61-70, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:1:p:61-70
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24073
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:1:p:61-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.