IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jindec/v74y2026i1p102-123.html

The Productivity Effect of Public–Private Partnership

Author

Listed:
  • Vincenzo Mollisi

Abstract

Public–Private partnerships (PPPs) are often employed by public authorities to deliver infrastructure and public services through contracts bundling construction, operation, and maintenance over extended periods. Using a novel dataset covering the universe of Italian district heating plants (DHs) from 2007 to 2014, I show that PPP improves firm‐level productivity by incentivizing investments in higher capital quality. Capital quality—proxied by a thermal density index derived from the characteristics of the DH pipeline network—significantly improves productivity only when combined with PPP procurement. A structural production function approach reveals that a one‐unit increase in capital quality raises output by 19% in PPP firms, with negligible effects in non‐PPP firms. Counterfactual calculations suggest that enforcing PPP‐like quality standards across all plants would increase average output by 3266 MWh and reduce CO2 emissions by 1568 tons per plant per year. The results are robust to selection bias, measurement error, and functional form misspecification. While this paper provides the first evidence that PPPs enhance productivity in network utilities by internalizing technological externalities between construction and operation, whether these gains fully translate into welfare improvements through pricing and Value for Money remains an open question for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincenzo Mollisi, 2026. "The Productivity Effect of Public–Private Partnership," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 102-123, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:74:y:2026:i:1:p:102-123
    DOI: 10.1111/joie.70013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.70013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joie.70013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:74:y:2026:i:1:p:102-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-1821 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.