IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jindec/v73y2025i4p540-554.html

Revisiting the Omitted Price Bias in the Estimation of Production Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Xulia González
  • Saul Lach
  • Daniel Miles‐Touya

Abstract

The lack of information on quantities presents significant challenges for estimating production functions. As shown by Klette and Griliches in 1996, deflating nominal variables using aggregate price indices leads to biased estimators. In this paper, we show that a similar problem arises when firm‐specific prices are recovered from reported firm‐specific price changes via a recursive formula. This recursion formula depends on an initial condition given by the unobserved price level in the base year, which then appears in the empirical production function as a firm‐specific fixed effect. The standard practice is to ignore these fixed effects by setting the firm‐specific prices in the base year to a constant value common to all firms, usually unity (zero in logs). We show that this practice generates biased estimators. We examine this bias via Monte Carlo simulations and with an empirical application. Solving this problem is not straightforward and requires further assumptions because these fixed effects generate nonlinear measurement errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Xulia González & Saul Lach & Daniel Miles‐Touya, 2025. "Revisiting the Omitted Price Bias in the Estimation of Production Functions," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(4), pages 540-554, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:73:y:2025:i:4:p:540-554
    DOI: 10.1111/joie.70001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.70001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joie.70001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:73:y:2025:i:4:p:540-554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-1821 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.