IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfnres/v49y2026i1p48-68.html

Employee diversity and litigation risk: Evidence from the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Devos
  • William B. Elliott
  • He Li
  • Adrian Tippit

Abstract

We examine the valuation effects of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which increases potential litigation over discriminatory compensation. Firms with relatively fewer women exhibit significant 3‐day abnormal returns of −0.61% around the passage of the Act, whereas firms with more women show no effect. Low‐female firms also display larger increases in implied cost of capital and larger decreases in expected cash flow than high‐female firms. No significant differences emerge based on racial diversity. Results suggest that investors perceive increased litigation risk and imply that firms in industries with higher gender pay gaps could increase value by reducing the pay gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Devos & William B. Elliott & He Li & Adrian Tippit, 2026. "Employee diversity and litigation risk: Evidence from the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 49(1), pages 48-68, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:49:y:2026:i:1:p:48-68
    DOI: 10.1111/jfir.70032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.70032
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jfir.70032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:49:y:2026:i:1:p:48-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.