IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jemstr/v34y2025i3p773-781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Returns Policy and Anticipated Regret

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Liu
  • Ramarao Desiraju
  • Gan Zou

Abstract

Restrictions on returning an undesirable purchase may make consumers feel regret, and they may account for such a potential postpurchase regret when selecting products. This paper incorporates regret‐averse consumers into a model of returns policy and compares two policies—a returns policy (which allows consumers to return undesirable purchases) and a no‐returns policy (which restricts consumer returns). We explore a canonical shopping setting where the no‐returns policy makes mismatched products unreturnable and triggers postpurchase consumer regret, whereas the alternative policy avoids such regret. Intuitively, one would expect businesses to not use the no‐returns policy when consumers can anticipate regret. Our stylized analytical model, however, shows that the no‐returns policy is not optimal unless it induces regret. In addition, contrary to conventional wisdom on competition in a vertically differentiated market, our results show that the no‐returns policy may be related to conceding a high‐quality advantage—that is, where a higher‐quality firm would charge a higher price, earning a higher profit. Essentially, to raise profit, the no‐returns policy serves as an instrument (through anticipated regret) by deliberately repositioning consumers' perceived quality to a lower level. Our results also show that consumers' regret intensity has an inverted‐U‐shaped relationship with profitability. In addition, we have examined the cases of firms and consumers incurring costs when dealing with returns, repurchasing after returning, and a strategic platform which decides the returns policy; and these analyses help highlight the robustness of our basic model. Echoing the long‐noted sentiment from industry experts and academics that, after products are introduced in the market, changing consumers' perceptions of those attributes is admittedly easier than altering actual product characteristics, our analysis suggests an approach to alter perceptions via the choice of a returns policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Liu & Ramarao Desiraju & Gan Zou, 2025. "Returns Policy and Anticipated Regret," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 773-781, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:773-781
    DOI: 10.1111/jems.12620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12620
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jems.12620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:773-781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/journals/JEMS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.