IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jemstr/v34y2025i3p759-772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rise of Remote Work Evidence on Productivity and Preferences From Firm and Worker Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Bartik
  • Zoë Cullen
  • Ed Glaeser
  • Michael Luca
  • Christopher Stanton

Abstract

Drawing on surveys of small business owners and employees, we present three main findings about the evolution of remote work after the onset of COVID‐19. First, uptake of remote work was abrupt and widespread in jobs suitable for telework according to the task‐based measure from Dingel and Neiman (2020). The initial adoption lead to a persistent shift in work arrangements that both firms and workers forecast would continue into the future. Second, business leaders' perceptions of how remote work affected productivity shifted over time. In early 2020, 70% of small business owners reported a productivity dip due to remote work. By contrast, the median business owner reported a positive productivity impact of remote work by 2021. Third, 21% of workers report being willing to accept a pay cut in excess of 10% if it allowed them to continue working from home, but the median worker in a teleworkable job would not tradeoff any compensation for the option of continued remote work. Taken together, our evidence points to perceived productivity gains and some workers' preferences as reasons for the persistence of remote work in the years following the onset of COVID‐19.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Bartik & Zoë Cullen & Ed Glaeser & Michael Luca & Christopher Stanton, 2025. "The Rise of Remote Work Evidence on Productivity and Preferences From Firm and Worker Surveys," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 759-772, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:759-772
    DOI: 10.1111/jems.12616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12616
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jems.12616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:759-772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/journals/JEMS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.