IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v40y2026i3p1518-1530.html

Assessing Offshore Wind Employment: A Systematic Meta‐Analysis of Investment and Policy Impacts in China, Denmark, and the US (2010–2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Vahid Gachi

Abstract

This study conducts the first systematic meta‐analysis of offshore wind energy investments and employment impacts in China, Denmark, and the United States from 2010 to 2023. Using 39 observations from 12 peer‐reviewed studies and reports, we apply a random‐effects model and meta‐regression with investments standardized to 2023 USD. Each billion USD invested generates on average 6,126 full‐time equivalent (FTE) jobs (95% CI: [5,361; 6,891]), though efficiency varies: 20,469 jobs/billion in Denmark, 5,585 in China, and 791 in the U.S. The meta‐regression highlights subsidies (coefficient: 980, p = 0.03), development status (1,102, p = 0.02), installed capacity (0.003/MW, p = 0.04), and active ports (100/port, p = 0.05) as key determinants, reducing heterogeneity from 75% to 58%. The per capita GDP × active ports interaction (−0.0000004, p = 0.05) adds negligible explanatory power. Denmark's export‐oriented supply chain explains high efficiency, while China, despite lower intensity, creates the largest aggregate jobs; U.S. outcomes remain constrained by limited capacity and import reliance. Policy implications include subsidies, stronger domestic supply chains, and targeted port infrastructure. Remaining heterogeneity and socio‐environmental trade‐offs underscore the need for further research to maximize offshore wind's dual role in sustainable transition and economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Vahid Gachi, 2026. "Assessing Offshore Wind Employment: A Systematic Meta‐Analysis of Investment and Policy Impacts in China, Denmark, and the US (2010–2023)," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 1518-1530, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:1518-1530
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.70028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70028
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.70028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:1518-1530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.