IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v40y2026i3p1483-1497.html

Evaluating Environmental, Social, and Governance Strategies in E‐Commerce: A Conceptual Framework on Alibaba Group's Practices and Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Luo Tiantian
  • Li Ran

Abstract

Amid the growing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles and the critical role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) frameworks in shaping the operational strategies of e‐commerce firms, this study explores their level of interaction, with a particular focus on Alibaba Group. The research aims to propose a conceptual framework designed to strengthen these interactions and benefit stakeholders, especially for Alibaba's global customer base. Data for the study was sourced from the Scopus database, as well as Alibaba's ESG reports. Through a systematic literature review, this study utilized Bibliometrix R Package and Microsoft Excel to analyze 93 documents refined from an initial pool of 891, filtered using Scopus tools and predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings reveal substantive interplay between ESG, CSR, and e‐commerce, with Alibaba demonstrating notable progress in achieving its ESG and CSR goals. The proposed conceptual framework emphasizes the pivotal role of customers in advancing the ESG‐CSR objectives of e‐commerce platforms within the context of global operations. These findings offer valuable insight to those seeking to develop ESG and CSR frameworks that balance economic performance with environmental and social accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo Tiantian & Li Ran, 2026. "Evaluating Environmental, Social, and Governance Strategies in E‐Commerce: A Conceptual Framework on Alibaba Group's Practices and Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 1483-1497, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:1483-1497
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.70065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.70065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:1483-1497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.