IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v40y2026i3p1306-1329.html

Connecting the Dots in ESG Review Research: Insights From Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Yeaw Chong Seow

Abstract

The exponential growth of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) review papers has underscored the urgent need for a comprehensive analysis of this expanding body of academic work. This study addresses this need by synthesizing ESG‐related review papers published between 2004 and 2024, utilizing systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis methodologies. Drawing on 114 review papers sourced from Scopus and Web of Science databases, the study examines their contributions through the lens of a modified contributor‐context‐characteristics‐methodology (CCCM) framework. This integrated approach allows for a comprehensive mapping of influential contributors, thematic trends, methodological frameworks, and gaps in interdisciplinary exploration. The key findings reveal a dominant emphasis on ESG disclosure and ESG–financial performance relationships, with bibliometric methods most frequently employed. The study also offers a structured roadmap for future research aimed at addressing fragmented knowledge and aligning scholarly inquiry with global sustainability objectives. By consolidating two decades of ESG review research into a single, systematically analyzed resource, this study bridges academic inquiry with practical applications, equipping policymakers, practitioners, and researchers with the insights necessary to drive meaningful progress in ESG practices and frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2026. "Connecting the Dots in ESG Review Research: Insights From Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 1306-1329, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:1306-1329
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.70045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70045
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.70045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:3:p:1306-1329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.