IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v40y2026i2p1083-1102.html

Metaverse in ESG Practices—A Game Changer or a Buzzword? A Methodological Framework and Research Agenda From a Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Slimane Ed‐Dafali
  • Khaled Hussainey
  • Zahra Adardour
  • Atar Derj
  • Samuel Fosso Wamba

Abstract

This research aims to provide an overview of metaverse adoption for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. Particularly, we seek to uncover the opportunities, risks, and outcomes of ESG‐metaverse convergence; identify barriers and enablers of this intersection; embed metaverse technologies in ESG strategies and processes using technological, organizational, and environmental (TOE) factors; and illuminate future research questions worth exploring. We applied a systematic literature review (SLR) using PRISMA guidelines to summarize, analyze, and discuss the existing studies. We reviewed 46 research studies up to 2024 from both Scopus and WOS databases. This review identified four main clusters: (1) metaverse challenges for ESG reporting, (2) the green financial metaverse, (3) blockchain‐based metaverse for sustainability reporting, and (4) metaverse technology application in business with sustainability and ESG orientation. This review presents original research uncovering both the ESG risks and opportunities of metaverse implementation and the barriers and enablers to ESG‐metaverse convergence by the integration of TOE factors. Furthermore, it develops a comprehensive, integrated framework for leveraging metaverse technology for ESG practices and positioning metaverse‐based technologies in ESG strategies and processes. Our study provides valuable insights for practitioners, academics, and policymakers to shape ESG effectiveness through innovative digital tools and metaverse‐based ESG practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Slimane Ed‐Dafali & Khaled Hussainey & Zahra Adardour & Atar Derj & Samuel Fosso Wamba, 2026. "Metaverse in ESG Practices—A Game Changer or a Buzzword? A Methodological Framework and Research Agenda From a Systematic Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 1083-1102, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:1083-1102
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.70036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70036
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.70036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:1083-1102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.